Post by account_disabled on Feb 28, 2024 4:35:53 GMT
The As I have already said, it is confirmed that the largest ones will be held responsible for irregularities first.The situation is similar with the number of penalties imposed in the EU - although there are over of them, as many as of them were imposed in Germany. Our western neighbors therefore confirm the stereotype of law-abiding people who supervise every aspect of the implementation of regulations. Let's start with two penalties imposed in Poland. Lower Silesian Football Association This punishment is less controversial and at the same time more beneficial for all those not punished.
What was it about? As it turned out, too much of the judges' data was disclosed - in addition to their names and surnames, the websites also included PESEL numbers and residential addresses unnecessarily. This, of course, exposed judges to the risk of Chinese Europe Phone Number List unlawful use of this data - imagine fans or impersonations of people knowing PESEL could look likeSo in the case in question we were dealing with "sharing" unnecessary data with the world. Importantly, there was cooperation with the authority, because the Association reported the violation itself in July. He claimed that he had deleted the data, but apparently he had only partially deleted it because he later received a substantiated complaint. For us, however, the most interesting thing are the numbers.
The data of judges was breached and the fine amounted to approximately PLN , . zloty. So assuming a partial cooperation with the authority,b deletion of data,c disclosure of such categories as address and PESEL number,we can value a single violation. It turns out that one violation "costs" approximately PLN , according to the Office it will probably be easier to round it up and remember the amount of PLN . This is the most valuable educational value of this punishment. Controversial first Polish penalty It's best to start with history again a certain company processed publicly.
What was it about? As it turned out, too much of the judges' data was disclosed - in addition to their names and surnames, the websites also included PESEL numbers and residential addresses unnecessarily. This, of course, exposed judges to the risk of Chinese Europe Phone Number List unlawful use of this data - imagine fans or impersonations of people knowing PESEL could look likeSo in the case in question we were dealing with "sharing" unnecessary data with the world. Importantly, there was cooperation with the authority, because the Association reported the violation itself in July. He claimed that he had deleted the data, but apparently he had only partially deleted it because he later received a substantiated complaint. For us, however, the most interesting thing are the numbers.
The data of judges was breached and the fine amounted to approximately PLN , . zloty. So assuming a partial cooperation with the authority,b deletion of data,c disclosure of such categories as address and PESEL number,we can value a single violation. It turns out that one violation "costs" approximately PLN , according to the Office it will probably be easier to round it up and remember the amount of PLN . This is the most valuable educational value of this punishment. Controversial first Polish penalty It's best to start with history again a certain company processed publicly.